Paperight and Riso Africa empower schools to print their own textbooks??

I don't believe that this is empowerment at all. Having sat though the awful sales pitch from RISO at the African Education Week Conference in June, we now see an attempt to embed the practice of photocopying into schools in a way which just promulgates the status quo and becomes a barrier to the digital revolution. Just like I said in my post about the conference sessions.

Why not use the costs associated with this outdated technology to fund mobile technology. It doesn't need to be big 1:1 schemes, but anything which prevents this type of situation and breaks the text-book cycle and indeed, the reliance on printed materials has to be progress.

Paperight and Riso Africa empower schools to print their own textbooks | The Paperight Blog

Disruption: Silicon Valley's Worst Buzzword

Is this really becoming one of those overused buzzwords in education?  I've always been a big fan of Clayton Christensen's book and his concept of disruptive technology because it made absolute sense to me. To be honest, I don't think I'm ready to let go just yet...especially as we are in the midst of a seismic disruption in education. This of course is the mobile devices revolution which is causing disruption to so many entrenched practices which truly should have been left behind in the twentieth century.

What do you think? Is it another candidate for the education buzzword bingo card?

Disruption: Silicon Valley's Worst Buzzword | New Republic

HMV Twitter fail offers lessons in corporate communications

This story, about the demise of one of the UK's most iconic high street shopping brands is a perfect example of what can go wrong with a brand on social media. Brand reputation is increasingly becoming such an important strand of the customer service/relations part of any business in this day and age of the online presence. It's incredibly important to protect your business reputation and you should consider expert advice on how to do this on the social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, FourSquare and Yelp,as well as consumer forums such as Hello Peter and Complaint's Board.

HMV Twitter fail offers lessons in corporate comms | Opinion | Marketing Week

Nomsindo - We Create Conversations... for your brand.

Blood on the Rooftops...

Let’s skip the news boy (I’ll go and make some tea)
Arabs and Jews boy (too much for me)
They get me confused boy (puts me off to sleep)
And the thing I hate, oh Lord!
Is staying up late, to watch some debate, on some nation’s fate

There’s been a lot of debate about what should be shown on television recently. The tragic murder of a soldier near his barracks in London earlier this year,as well as the Marikana mine shootings has brought this sharply into focus. With the advent of twenty four hour news channels and the hundreds of choices we now have, its easy to forget that not so long ago when I was growing up,we only had three tv channels. But would they have stopped whatever was showing to give a continuous commentary on the tragic events of this week? Maybe. After all, the Iranian Embassy siege and the subsequent SAS rescue was shown live and I remember as a child being rather annoyed at the interruption to whatever it was I was watching at the time.

So do we live our lives through television? Has the cult of celebrity and social media interactivity led us to live in some international ‘real time’ where our lives are dominated not by what we do or who we are, but by other influences reaching us by cable,wifi and satellite?

I was reminded of this by the lyrics from the Genesis song, ‘Blood on the Rooftops’. From my favourite Genesis album, Wind and Wuthering (and I love the reference in the lyrics to another favourite of mine, Lindisfarne’s  Fog on the Tyne) Its about a couple whose lives are dominated by the television of their day. Written by Phil Collins, they refer to a “typical” middle-aged couple that have very little else to do with their lives than to watch TV, and complain about the content. The various references to TV programmes show how the escapism of fantasy and fiction impact so deeply on their lives that they have real problems distinguishing between that escapism and the grim events of the real world. What would they have made of the TV footage shown repeatedly, of the young soldier’s murder I wonder?

Were the news channels right to show the tragic and gruesome footage over and over again? It’s certainly available on demand on the internet, but many will now be asking the question, should it be? The middle aged couple who seem to be narrating the story in the song don’t appear to like the serious stuff, all that blood on the rooftops is too much for them. They would be horrified with the twenty four  hour news channels today.

I think we've crossed the Rubicon myself. Our lives are made up of a pastiche of soundbites from multimedia sources, and in fact, its changed the way we view most aspects of our lives. I suppose we must also accept that for all the benefits this brings, there will be some potentially big negatives too and maybe recent events in London, and perhaps the shootings of the striking South African miners last year (also shown repeatedly on TV) are examples of this which certainly make some hanker for the simpler way of life from days gone past. But as the Genesis song perhaps illustrates the problem of living our lives through the media may always have been with us, in some shape or other…

Dark and grey, an English film, the Wednesday play
We always watch the Queen on Christmas Day
Won’t you stay?

Though your eyes see shipwrecked sailors you’re still dry
The outlook’s fine though Wales might have some rain
Saved again.

Let’s skip the news boy (I’ll go and make some tea)
Arabs and Jews boy (too much for me)
They get me confused boy (puts me off to sleep)
And the thing I hate, oh Lord!
Is staying up late, to watch some debate, on some nation’s fate.

Hypnotized by Batman, Tarzan, still surprised!
You’ve won the West in time to be our guest
Name your prize!

Drop of wine, a glass of beer dear what’s the time?
The grime on the Tyne is mine all mine all mine
Five past nine.

Blood on the rooftops, Venice in the spring
The Streets of San Francisco, a word from Peking
The trouble was started, by a young Errol Flynn
Better in my day, oh Lord!
For when we got bored, we’d have a world war, happy but poor
So let’s skip the news boy (I’ll go and make some tea)
Blood on the rooftops (too much for me)
When old Mother Goose stops, and they’re out for twenty three
Then the rain at Lords stopped play
Seems Helen of Troy has found a new face again.

“Blood on the Rooftops” as written by Phil Collins and Steve Hackett

Is social Media disruptive in the classroom?

African Education Week, held in Johannesburg every year is the largest education conference on the continent.  This year, I was asked to give a short presentation and then take part in a panel discussion around the use of the social web in the classroom. The text of my presentation is below (and thanks to Ollie Bray for the idea of using the change slides from Karl Fisch ).

Is social media disruptive in the classroom? Yes…of course it is,and this is a good thing we need to embrace and nurture

When I was preparing for today’s session, I thought for a little while on the meaning, in today’s context, of the word ‘disruptive’. Now, it can of course mean disruptive to classroom learning, or disruptive in the sense we understand by the term ‘Disruptive Technology’. But actually, both need to be contextualised in a positive way because they can be one and the same thing.  

In Scotland they have had a national schools intranet since 2006. It was the first national intranet for schools in the world and…. It never really worked properly, at least,in the way teachers would have wanted it to work. It was in my personal view, almost out of date before it was actually rolled out….seriously.  I’ve just spent the past year or as a part of a small advisory group set up to examine and report on the options for it’s replacement. We've spent a lot of time trying to design something which is based upon Self organised learning, and the social web, and is as future proof as possible.

But the biggest challenge to the whole project from it’s inception back in the early noughties to the present day has probably,if we’re honest, not been the intranet,or the idea of an intranet,  but rather has been resistance to change..from educators mainly.   The kids are all saying come on…bring it on…no problems fromtheir perspective.In fact, they welcome technology with open arms, embracing it, subverting it, using it for their benefit.It’s the world they live inand it needs to become one we as educators and teachers at least join in and try to become equal partners with the kids in.The balance of power in learning is shifting away from the traditional transmission model of teaching.

Education systems the world over have always had a resistance to change. Anything new or unknown, anything which challenges the current understanding or hierarchy. I bought a few examples of this with me today

Thanks to Ollie Bray for first showing me these slides in one of his presentations a few years ago

So you see….. change has always provoked fear and resistance. But we are living in a world which is going through another revolution. We’ve had the agricultural revolution in the C18, the industrial revolution in the C19, political revolutions in the C20 and now we are in the midst of the information revolution. And this cannot bypass our classrooms as if they were islands in the stream resisting the current of progress. I agree with Steven Heppell when he said that we just spent the whole of the twentieth century perfecting a nineteenth century model of education for the industrial age. I believe that it’s just not fit for purpose anymore – this idea that we can churn out compliant and malleable individuals who will fit into traditional hierarchies without kicking back at all – it’s an absolute nonsense.

Ken Robinson,in a recent TED talk put it this way. He said…  

‘Our children are living in the most intensely stimulating period in the history of the earth. Yes,,, really! They are being besieged with information and calls for their attention from every platform. From computers, from Smartphones, from advertising hoardings, from 100’s of television and radio channels. And we’re punishing them now for getting distracted.  From what? Boring stuff. At school, for the most part.

Now, most great learning happens in groups. Social media enables this collaboration. If we explode these groups of kids into individual parts we separate them from their natural learning environments.  In school, we tell them there is one answer, and its in the back of the book so don’t look. And don’t copy. In the outside world, this is called collaboration. ( If you’re not familiar with Ken, check him out….on YouTube)

Kids today are ‘Screenagers’ and they are completely comfortable with web 3.0 – the creative web. Many of us are still coming to terms with web 2.0…the consumptive web. There is the real tension. They come into school and we expect them to ‘power down’. Why… Why…why… must they stop communicating and collaborating just because they happen to be confined between four walls *we* call a  *classroom*

Now Sir Ken has more to say

   ’But its not all bad news.. Many countries globally are trying to create classrooms that challenge traditional models and reverse the hierarchy, allow young people to communicate and collaborate, that provide an authentic audience for children’s work’

This is what social media is all about. It’s simply another more culturally relevant tool for facilitating learning.The frightening thing for many teachers is that they can’t control it.  I think this is something we have to help our teachers let go of

Young people are engaged when they are learning about things or with things that they can relate too or that are relevant to them. Social media is highly culturally relevant at the moment for young people and harnessing these tools for education can develop really powerful contexts for learning.

Do you remember that aircraft which took off from La Guardia Airport in New York flew into a flock of birds suffered a double engine loss and glided to safety landing on the Hudson River back in 2009? Those images of Captain Sullenberger the pilot walking on the wings of his 737 guiding his passengers to the safety of waiting boats after pulling of what must truly rank as one of the most spectacular aircraft landings ever. This story hit the world first via twitter before the traditional media channels had got their acts together. Imagine if you’d had this happening during your class? What an amazing learning opportunity?

 So Social media is also highly relevant across society as a whole. For example in the UK in 2012 eight out of the ten most popular search terms were directly linked to a social website. Facebook was the most popular search term. And you tube was the second most popular search engine. Young people today don’t look in books for answers on how to do things if they have a choice…they go to you tube and watch someone actually doing it. Our world is evolving. New ideas will spread the whole way around the world in less than 48 hours. That’s the power of the YouTube video clip!  It’s even less time on Twitter.  Social media is global and ubiquitous. This is evolution, but not as we’ve previously understood the word. Now the term evolution is used to describe changes which occur much more rapidly than Darwin could ever have dreamed about. 

So with this in mind, think about this concept…. I call it  ’Knowledge Grazing’. Just looking at something on line, or searching for something specific takes us on a self organised but still very messy journey through learning. Try going to a Wikipedia page for a topic or subject which interests you. Can you defy the psychology which makes clicking on hyperlinks almost impossible to resist?

This is a heutagogical approach which could see a return to a more focussed and user-centred project- based learning, but this time, with projects directed by the individual learner.  As educators, all we need to do is set the parameters, then work individually with our students, helping, providing advice, and yes, even teaching them that it’s not just ok to recycle and mash up knowledge, but that the real goal is to reboot it, make it work, and truly own it.  By this I mean evaluating what is discovered,  properly crediting the work of others and commenting on how relevant it might be to the project, whilst benchmarking it against the set parameters. We’re not just looking for old-style factual regurgitation. Those days are long gone, left behind by the post industrial information age. We should be in the business of helping learners to become consummate knowledge Rebooters.

It’s not what you know but how you use it. 

So to sum up…yes, social media *IS* disruptive in the classroom

Yes,  it disrupts traditional models of teaching (information transmission)

and honestly, if something is able to be disrupted, than it deserves to be disrupted.

Pedagogy, as we’ve traditionally understood it is being replaced by heutagogy, or Self Directed Learning.

Social Media has re energised learning. We live in the Soundbite generation. Use it, … because I tell you this….. if you dislike the change,  you’ll like the irrelevance even less.

And after all,  as  someone else once said …. aren't the best teachers are those who show students where to look but don’t tell them what to see? 

New kid on the block

Apple has a competitor in the tablet education content arena. But will it be a strong enough offering to take away business from the market leader?

At long last, the there is a new kid on the block. I recently looked at Samsung’s Smart School offering at the African Education Week exhibition. Essentially it’s rather like Apple TV in the way it links a class set of tablets ( Samsung Galaxy) with an eBoard screen and the class teacher who is able to push content and assessment, as well as control activity on each pupil’s tab and show work on the eBoard screen.

Samsung are promising content too. They've hooked up with education publishers to provide this. But there’s a strong emphasis on consumption here. I'm uncomfortable with the apparent lack of creation apps for education.

I guess what I'm asking though is will it be enough to make a dent in Apple’s education business? After all, the iLife content creation suite of tools is outstanding and highly rated by educationalists who use it. Added to this is the content available through iTunesU and the education support service, and you have a pretty unbeatable overall package.

Samsung have made a start in competing with Apple for the lucrative education business. But with the vast majority of schools having iPads rather than Android devices as their ultimate wished-for tablet, they still have a steep hill to climb…

And the folks at the conference who promised to get back to me with some more information still haven't done so yet, Samsung Southern Africa.  Apple would have done so by now....

African Education Week 2013 (pt 2)

Thoughts on African education week -day one session two

I felt rather sorry for the panel chair during this session. Leading education technology expert, Kobus Van Wyk must have felt like he'd been transported back twenty years to an education conference in the last century, such was the appalling standard of presentation. I must qualify this first though, because it would be fair to say that the first and last presentations were fantastic, with Fred Baumhardt of Microsoft giving us a futuristic look at what should soon be everyday use of touch projected technology, and Headteacher Ansie Peens giving us her experiences of a 1:1 tablet roll out programme in her state school.

However, these two fascinating talks bookended three appalling sales pitches from vendors set upon using existing technology to do existing jobs. The future of content provision is not photocopying sections of textbooks for kids who forgot to pack their schoolbooks (I'm not even going to validate the presentation from the photocopying salesperson with a discussion), and neither is it in digitising existing or pimped-up copies of existing textbooks with a few hyperlinks and interacties bolted on. These three sales pitches were poor because they were so misplaced. They add to the very real risk that the potential from increased access to devices in schools via tablet provision will be squandered due to use of downloaded and expensive static texts.

As Microsoft's Fred Baumhardt showed us, the future is in user-generated and searched for content, freely available on the web. Open Education Resources are the now and the future, not these expensive digitized textbooks or photocopies of notes and worksheets. If schools are suckered in by the text-book publishers instead of trying to effect *real* transformation of learning by shifting the focus away from prescriptive texts and moving to a looser messier student-centred approach. Text books are a comfort blanket to an approach that can descend into little more than a teaching-by-numbers regime.

Kids today are ‘Screenagers’ and they are completely comfortable with web 3.0 - the creative web. Many of us are still coming to terms with web 2.0…the consumptive web. There is the real tension. They come into school and we expect them to ‘power down ’

We need to be spending education funding much more carefully. Resources should be concentrated on fast reliable Internet access and wifi. This gives every classroom a window to the world. The world is the new classroom, not the tablet, smartphone or other device or the content it contains, and if we don't help our kids to enter this world-wide learning space, we prevent them from not only consuming content, but creating and sharing their own. This is what the speakers in the middle slots failed to grasp and unfortunately, this failure hampers school leaders like Ansie who has made such an incredible leap of faith into the future with her technology provision programme. Using tablets just for purchased digitised content is just doing old things in new ways.

Surely the time has come for us to use technology to do new things.

African Education Week 2013

THOUGHTS ON AFRICAN EDUCATION WEEK DAY ONE- FIRST SESSION.

This was my first time at African Education Week. This conference is southern Africa's biggest annual education showcase, featuring keynote speakers, workshops, panel debates, and trade exhibitors.  I arrived in Johannesburg of an early morning flight from Cape Town, taking the brand new 'Gautrain' shuttle (built for the Football world cup in 2010) to the Sandton Convention Centre and making it just in time to hear the first speaker, Dr Mamphela Ramphele open the conference. 

Now, Dr Ramphele is a long time critic of the current ANC-led South African Government and she wasted no time setting about them. Her assertion that "textbooks are the money laundering tool for the politically connected- that's why schools don't have textbooks"  caused a ripple of applause around the conference hall.  As did her assertion that the Education portfolio in government always seems to be encumbered with the weakest of the political elite in Africa.

She then criticised the current state of South African Education, particularly it's lack of technology, poor standard of teaching and professional development, and reliance on printed textbooks, promising a whole raft of improvements in the manifesto of her political party, Agang, at the elections in 2014. You can read her speech here

 Dr Ramphele is a controversial figure in South African Politics and she certainly lived up to her reputation in her speech. I'd put in a note of caution to Dr Ramphele here- education is a big conversation. You can't just announce policy, you must first join the conversation.  Particularly with regard to testing and assessment. It's not enough just to talk in raw scores and the raising of so-called pass mark levels..

I have to admit the next speaker left me a bit cold. Businessman and 'motivator' Kelly Ritchie appeared to spend his twenty five minutes shouting and taking his clothes off, even managing to forget his mic clip in the process. I'm still not sure what his message to the conference was really all about. I think others around me shared that view, judging from their bemused expressions.

 Luckily, Louise Van Rhyn rescued the morning with a thoughtful presentation echoing her Cape Town TED talk earlier this year. The message of school improvement by the community and business is similar to the ABCD approach developed by Cormac Russell . I'm not sure I agree with her thoughts on the quality of educational leadership though...I believe there is tremendous capacity to lead in our education system with talented people keen to step up and realise their potential. I know from my own management experience in industry that the skills required to lead in business are not always the same as in education and style can definitely be very different. Whilst business leaders can bring much to the table, what is really needed in order for South African Education to better realise leadership potential is good quality targeted professional development in education leadership and management.

Gavin Keller was brilliant, for me, the star of the morning. A real example of South African Educational leadership talent in action. Inspiring and culturally relevant, he held the conference hall in the palm of his hand- one educator to a hall full of others. A great presentation on responsibility and leadership with a nod to neurobiology. Change is too slow because teachers don't feel 'worthy' . Confidence is a key factor in effective leadership. I agree. I'm pretty sure he's a fan of Andy Hargreaves too... The take home message for me is that we need to nurture the emotional capacity of our educators in schools if we want to encourage change and success.

Johannes Cronje spoke next about leading change in a digital age. In a fantastically engaging presentation with much of it off the cuff, he took the audience on a journey of how he's kept up with the changing digital landscape. Making the point that with SMS and WhatsApp, as well as twitter and Facebook, our students probably read more than they ever did before.  His talk covered some of his experiences with his own students and you can see his presentation here.

Interestingly, both Johannes and Gavin took pot- shots at the humble pencil. I'm not sure I agree with this, indeed I think the demise of the pencil has been greatly exaggerated, to paraphrase the famous quote. I do agree with the thrust of both these speakers and Dr Ramphele in reinforcing the tablet agenda. Anything which gets rid of the annual text-book beano has to be welcomed, however, I'd strike a note of caution here as the eBook publishing vultures hover poised to push their wares onto unsuspecting schools flush with their shiny new tablets. Think before you buy- the age of Open Education Resources is well and truly upon us, and materials for learning and teaching are available....for free. 

                                                 (The lights are on but there's nobody home )

A pretty good first session. Some interesting thoughts on leadership and school improvement, however, whilst Louise's project moves one school at a time onto the agenda as one way forward, as ever, the practical application of the words and presentations needs sound and thoughtful political leadership as well. It would have been good to hear from the Government  minister responsible for South African Education,  however, the lack of any representation from this quarter was particularly notable this morning.

One big gripe though...there was no free wifi available to delegates. Quite frankly, in this day and age for an international conference  not to have a free wifi facility is nothing short of appalling!. Perhaps there would have been higher level of outward engagement through social media if this had been the case, because out of over a hundred delegates in the hall, less than ten percent were using their own 3G for live tweeting. 

 If African Education Week wants to take it's place amongst the leading education conferences of the world, this glaring omission really must be rectified for next year's event.

Building disruptive capacity - the challenge for tablet use

The increasing use of tablet devices in our schools brings with it many advantages. Better access, up to date applications, and student engagement to name but a few. Overseas, the Scottish Government national procurement framework and other bulk purchase schemes will undoubtedly expedite the provision of these devices to their classrooms, but I’d sound just a tiny note of caution, because with any education technology, it’s really about how the tech is used, and what, if any, transformative impact it will have on learning.

I guess the real success of tablet device use will be measured in the way it increases creativity, rather than consumption. And this will depend on weather the tablets are treated as just the ‘evolution’ of technology use; the latest version of Internet access, or on how much they are treated as a truly disruptive technology

Evolutionary technology usually tends to reiterate the status quo. Disruptive technology, on the other hand, tends to move the agenda on towards doing things differently or doing new things all together. During numerous school visits last year, I saw a mix of both. And this is bound to happen in any education ecosystem, where some folks will be more confident or ahead of the curve with technology use than others.

The key, in my view, is to build ‘disruptive capacity’ so that new technology adoption quickly moves away from the evolution state into the disruptive landscape. To do this, those of us who would consider ourselves as innovators need to move out of the echo chamber and make much more effort to communicate with those a bit further behind on the curve. ThePedagoo movement in Scotland and the UK is doing a fantastic job in this respect, and other on line communities are trying to do the same in other parts of the world.

This activity will help educators and schools to use tablets, and indeed, any new technology, as disruptive rather than evolutionary. For creativity rather than consumption. Like the kids I saw in an Edinburgh primary school who were collaborating on writing and publishing their own iBooks using their class iPads for example. This sort of creativity moves the use of technology on leaps and bounds to a situation where you couldn't do the new things without the new tools, creating capacity not only in creativity, but in skills too- real disruptive capacity building in action.

(Image from ScoopIt.it )

A back to basics idea for Teachmeet...

This is a post I wrote for EdchatSA site. Check it  out when you can - there are loads of great things over there...I've cross posted it here to kick things off. 

The teachmeet concept, which started in a pub in Edinburgh, Scotland in 2005 has spread pretty much around the world in only a few short years. The first teachmeet (I wasn't at that one…but I was at the second and subsequent ones) consisted of four or five colleagues sharing ideas, and quickly developed into the format we know today from the ‘official’ wiki.

• 7-minute presentations on classroom experience or tools used
• 3-minute nano-presentations on brief ideas or useful websites/tools
• Round table discussions on agreed subjects recorded and published in some way
• No sales pitches (apart from a nod to the sponsors and maybe a very short spot)
• Absolutely NO PowerPoint presentations.
• Amusing and witty MC not afraid to stop folks who've reached their time limit.

Now the venue was always less important than the ‘unconference’ ethos. Teachmeet was an antidote in many ways, to the sterile and un-engaging CPD delivered to teachers rather than involving them. Teach-meets usually (and preferably) take place away from schools, colleges or other formal institutions. This was a deliberate attempt to separate from establishment or organised CPD ).

And, it worked. Sponsors quickly saw the value of associating with the concept and therefore a venue was usually found, equipment sourced from participants, and drinks and nibbles purchased. The events were usually followed by an even less formal Teach-eat in a local restaurant or pub where the discussions continued far into the night…The concept quickly spread out across the UK from its birthplace in Scotland, and then was exported worldwide. It probably reached its zenith at the now-legendary Islay unconference in 2009. You can read about this event, Education 2020 here and here.

However, recently, there’s been a shift away from some of these guiding principles. Some teach-meets are now scheduled as in-school activities at the end of the school day, and in school itself. The original idea of 7 minute presentations has been axed in favour of shorter 3 minute shots. I think this in itself is a bad move as the 7 minute slot allowed you to cover a something in a little detail. 3 minutes leads to some shallowness at times. There needs to be a balance of sound bites and deeper experience re-telling.

The shift to using teach-meet as a formalised CPD offering held in a school in my view defeats the original ethos of independence and disestablishmentarianism.(!).

Whilst it’s great to see the format changed and adapted, I'm uncomfortable with this shift towards incorporation into something which is delivered to teachers, instead of being crowdsourced *from* them. Even if it’s only five folks in a pub using a laptop to share ideas, it is in my view, better than a shift to adoption by a hierarchy, and subsumation into that hierarchy.

Could we get back to the original idea, and replicate it in SA? I live in Cape Town, and would love to attend a teachmeet like this somewhere in the area. Is there the appetite from Mother City teachers and educators (and the surrounding environs, of course) for a back to basics teachmeet?

(Image from http://olliebray.typepad.com/olliebraycom/)